Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Jason Anderson's avatar

I am also a lawyer who left millions on the table to fight Donald Trump.

You can't disprove it.

Shout out to Matthew Wollin, holding it down for non-scumbag lawyers everywhere…

Expand full comment
Johan's avatar

The farce isn’t just that lawyers walked away from millions. It’s that most have helped reinforce and build the system that made such a walkout possible…and inevitable.

This story isn’t about a few disillusioned attorneys. It’s about the architecture of American power: a legal-industrial complex that monetizes proximity, rewards silence, and ritualizes complicity. These lawyers didn’t just leave money on the table…they left a system they helped design, one that treats law as a tool of access, not accountability.

From a behavioral standpoint, the U.S. legal system isn’t built to deliver justice. It’s built to simulate it, through procedure, delay, and spectacle.

• Lawyers become gatekeepers of legitimacy.

• Clients become pawns in reputational chess.

• Outcomes hinge on narrative control, not truth.

And when the stakes get too high, (when the client is a president, a billionaire, or a regime) the system doesn’t collapse. It tightens.

It protects itself.

It rewards those who play along.

And it punishes those who don’t with exile, not exposure.

This is why the legal profession, for all its rhetoric about ethics and duty, often functions as a behavioral firewall—-shielding power from consequence.

The lawyers who walked away didn’t just reject Trump. They rejected the farce they helped sustain.

And the wider truth?

Law in America is not a moral compass. It’s a performance protocol.

One designed to absorb dissent, delay reckoning, and preserve the illusion of order.

Reality…

— Johan

Professor of Behavioral Economics & Applied Cognitive Theory

Former Foreign Service Officer

Expand full comment
17 more comments...

No posts