9 Comments
User's avatar
A.Gnosticthefirst's avatar

Epstein presented as well-dressed and well-groomed, and Bannon strikes me as smelly and in need of a bath. It's amazing what a common interest can do.

Sandi Ault's avatar

I write about the irony and compare it to Beckett's WAITING FOR GODOT.

https://sandiault.substack.com/p/waiting-on-the-world-to-change

Waiting for the Epstein files. Waiting for Godot. Women are waiting on the world to change.

Jameswantsthetruth's avatar

I’m glad you said exactly what I was thinking. Since Trump was a Democrat during the time he was friends with Epstein his calling for Democrats to be called out based on their connections to Epstein should still include him.

Andre Furzer's avatar

Following your reporting on Wolff , great job 👏 💪. Also check DM for link. Interview with Drop Site journalist, indicating Epstein more likely to be rubbing shoulders with DAVOS not Mossad or CIA

Al Draycott's avatar

Thanks Tara & Cameron : Yes the Starr report back in 1998 was released in forty eight hours, I suppose It was because a democrat was involved. Clinton was the president and the republicans controlled both house and senate. Today the republicans control all three branches which is a great impediment of the Epstein files. Trump is well noted with various sexual proclivities and his reluctance to release the entire Epstein files causes one to assume he is guilty of sexual misdeeds. The multiple complaints from women accusing Trump of sexual assault only bolsters the assumption of guilt. It is alleged some women dropped the charges due to threats. "When your rich a famous they let you do it." A statement from a perverted soul.

GSF's avatar

Can Senators or the House demand the appointment of a special prosecutor to investigate this?

GSF's avatar

Do people who have the pedophile names not want to release their list because of some legal jeopardy or do they want to await the Epstein release?